Torn apart movie 2006 online dating speed dating questions for students
Squidfryerchef (talk) , 5 July 2008 (UTC) Let me clarify: the fact that the experiment was conducted by a TV newsmagazine under non-scientific circumstances makes it unsuitable to form a part of the section on scientific research, by definition. The sample size was too small and intervening variables were not taken into account, etc.
--Amit , 8 April 2006 (UTC)If it hasn't been published, then it can't go in Wikipedia.I will be putting the section back unless you can disprove anything there, which you really cannot even if you try.And now don't you go around removing the mathematical formulas for common knowledge also. --Amit , 8 April 2006 (UTC)Please note that the burden of proof for inclusion of material on Wikipedia is with you: see WP: V ,specifically "The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain".In my opinion, as a matter of courtesy, he should have tagged them as unsourced, waited a while, then copied them here, but in any case what he did is in accord with the verifiability policy.I have provided a source for the item about Malcolm Gladwell's book, Blink and reinserted it.